My husband is back in Afghanistan and I recently picked up a book about Afghanistan. My mother bought it some time ago and recently finished it. I don’t know whether her buying it had anything to do with my being there.
The book is The Places in Between by Rory Stewart. The guy spends his vacations walking around Asian countries and this book is about his walk from Herat to Kabul in early 2002.
The first thing that struck me when reading the book is how poorly Afghans come off. Although many reviewers did not seem to notice this (though the New York Times reviewer sort of did), I think that most Afghans, if they were to read the book, would call Mr. Stewart a liar.
Of course, they would be wrong. It was difficult for me to read all the hypocrisy (”Muslims are the most hospitable people; We are the most hospitable Muslims; now give me money to buy the dry crust of bread I am serving you…”) again since most of the time I was there I worked hard to block it out. When there, I constantly echoed the Afghans’ own mantra: Afghanistan is an extremely hospitable country, Afghanistan is an extremely hospitable country…
I repeated this although I was invited to about 10 times fewer homes in my two years there than my time in Russia and Tajikistan. A number of times I found myself, like Mr. Stewart, invoking Muslim hospitality in order to get the most modest concession (e.g. letting us drive through a village where we had sponsored a project) out of people. And unlike Stewart, I usually had something to offer and never came with a weapon.
I never entered a house in the former Soviet Union without having food shoved into my hands. I never left a Tajik home without food in my hands or in my stomach. In Tajikistan, if you refuse food, they give you something to walk out the door with, and will trick you into taking it if you refuse.
One suspects that many of the readers of The Places in Between will not understand the extent to which Stewart’s narrative condemns the Afghans he met, because they do not know what is the real tradition of Asian hospitality. They may not know that in Russia, where millions still live without land, electricity, or even more than $1.50 per day, that if you enter the house of a poor person, you risk plunging him into starvation because he really will give you his last piece of bread. If you so much look at someone’s coat, he will give it to you. They may not know that when Stewart comments on being refused entry to a house, he is basically condemning the owner of the house to hell- since hospitality is a must in the Muslim tradition.
Of course, part of it is Stewart’s fault. Rather than relying on strangers and normal people, poor people, he is forced by the situation and his own approach to rely on commanders and their lackeys- not the most generous or hospitable Afghans. He uses the old-fashioned tradition of getting letters of authority to go from one area to the next, so that he is always under someone’s protection.
In Afghanistan, this means he was always under some warlord’s protection. When you deal with butchers and mafia men, you have to expect to be surrounded by nasty people.
Whether he could have made it one kilometer on his own is another question, but I suspect that it is possible if only just. And I’m certain that if he had, he would have encountered an entirely different country- perhaps one full of people like the guards who begged him to stay with them when their master was out, who I’m sure would have fried him their last eggs, and borrowed money to feed him fresh bread.
I am sure of this because though I was invited into few houses, those people showed amazing kindness and generosity. And I was treated to the remnants of Asian hospitality at least once… when I complimented a colleague on her scarf, and she gave it to me, against all insistence and persuasion to make her keep it. It almost reminded me of Russia…